Change Your Environment, By Katelyn Chapman

Our environment effects us as a person, a leader, an organization, a family---everything. Why does it? I propose that our environment is part of the "system" we are in. It's like Dr. Beitler says in Organizational Change with the Systems Model that:

More often than not, the person is not 'the problem.' The problem is typically
embedded in the system. If we don't change the system, we will soon face the
same problem again (p.14, 2006).

Let's talk about how the environment effects us as individuals and groups.

First, as an individual... We can have wonderful goals...but are our behaviors in line with those goals? AND, do we have a SYSTEM supporting our goals? More specifically, is your environment helping you get closer to those goals or is it hindering your goals? I referenced in "CREATE and ACHIEVE Your Personal Vision" one part of your environment- people.

You can create your Dream Team by identifying people in your life who help you achieve what you want. They are the ones providing positive support and even asking difficult questions that help you grow and achieve your vision. So, we want a Dream Team...but who are the other people detracting from your goal? Why are you still keeping them in your life? Alexis Jones from i am that girl keeps it short and simple: "If they are not helping you achieve your goal, eliminate them from your life."

Another part of the environment is anything you can sense- touch, smell, see, hear, taste. What sensing things can you change in your environment to reinforce your goal? Can you add natural light to help you brighten up? Can you listen to headphones to add an afternoon energy boost? Can you light a candle that makes your working space cozier?

As a group, the environment also is important. The environment WE create sets the tone and fosters a culture. What culture do you want in your family, group, organization? Want a culture where everyone feels comfortable? Feels welcome? Feels energized? Feels motivated? How do you match the strategy of your organization with the necessary culture? Beitler explains Cameron and Quinn's "types of organizational culture" in Strategic Organizational Change:

Clan- Is like an extended family where the leader is frequently a parental figure. Loyalty or tradition holds the organization together. Success is defined in terms of sensitivity to customers and employees (Beitler, 2006). Therefore, how could the environment facilitate this? Could the company ask for employee and customer suggestions on what the decor is or what music is played?

Adhocracy- It features temporary team membership and constantly changing structure. Creativity and new ideas are seen as successful (Beitler, 2006). How could the environment promote this vibe? Bright colors on the wall? Unique decor? Innovative companies like 3M, Google and Amazon give developers about 20% of free time, or time to play.

Market- Is market-driven and highly competitive. Market share and market penetration define succesful market culture companies (Beitler, 2006). How can you promote a competitive environment. Many sales organizations do this by having individual sales numbers showcased on a wall, where the top winners will receive extra bonuses or vacations to warm destinations. You could use a simple whiteboard to increase the competitive heat in your group...

Hierarchy- Is formal and highly structured. Efficiency defines success (Beitler, 2006). How can you promote an efficient environment? How about monitoring the cost of scraps and trying to decrease that number? You could also post this in a common space where workers see their target and what they met. We saw this on a factory tour of a gas pump company that strives to decrease costs and increase efficiency.

How will you change your individual and work environment?

Recently I wanted to promote the clan culture in my work. I started something new in a central location with two objects- paper and a computer. First, I took butcher paper and added a "Quote of the day" with a positive, inspirational quote. Then I welcomed co-workers to add their own quote.

Then with the computer, I played some rockin’ tunes! Who doesn’t enjoy a little jam session mid day? It’s something small but can change the culture in a beat.

What was the result of these two simple objects and change?

It created a fun and inviting atmosphere. It has the direct ability to positively affect attitudes in our office. Fellow co-workers have been randomly breakin' it down, reminiscing as certain songs bring back vivid memories, laughing at other songs, and igniting other conversations that the song is their favorite artist. Something “small” but that creates change. The environment and culture affect us, as they are part of our system. What have you done or will do to change it?

Author:
Katelyn Chapman

Leading Change in the Entrepreneurially-Focused Organization, By Joseph Erba

Successfully leading an organization of any form or size must incorporate the leader’s vision with a well-grounded strategy of how the organization will move towards that vision. The premise here is that the term “entrepreneurial” refers to a mindset of thoughts and actions rather than venture creation; which can be an outcome of this mindset, but not a prerequisite of such. Those actions include allowing innovation to thrive by redefining the definition of “failure” and executing a strategy through proactive forays into existing and new market arenas.

It’s fair to say that in order to implement a strategy, the leaders must be able to effectively manage the resources at their disposal, albeit financial, operational and most importantly, the human resources of the firm. If we accept the basis that “ Management” focuses on the transformation of inputs into outputs, on maximizing the available resources at their disposal and coordinating those resources for the benefit of achieving goals and objectives, we can also contend that “Leadership” focuses on exploiting the corporate capabilities of the organization to reach their objectives, while also exploring how to challenge and change these capabilities in order for the organization to stay relevant and build some level of sustainable competitive advantages.

Yet regardless of how dynamic or charismatic a leader or leadership group is, or how compelling their value proposition may be to their internal and external audiences, a series of fundamental challenges face them at every turn.

These challenges include defining (or in some cases redefining) the direction of the company in light of an ever-changing business environment, assessing the capabilities and competencies of the teams of managers and contributors that form the core capabilities of the organization, while attempting to address the societal challenges of changing demographics and lifestyles in the environments served.

So in a rather simple way, we can say that a leader is a juggler, a balancer, an individual framed in the present, but focused on the future. As these leaders articulate their visions, their missions and goals for their organizations, their role becomes one of a communicator, one of supporting the messages presented both vertically and horizontally through their organizations.

In the context of corporate entrepreneurship, we understand that the three drivers of innovation, risk-taking and proactive behaviors create another set of compelling challenges, especially when the organization is facing some level of change (such as redefining their markets, renewing their strategic direction or looking externally for available partnerships). The premise here is that change in itself is no longer an “event” rather an integral part of the strategy of the firm.

Yet embracing change requires constant and consistent messaging. Communicating throughout the organization must be effective enough to challenge the organization to move beyond the comfort levels of their current positions to areas of potential uncertainty without disrupting the balance of the organization.

Studies have indicated that these efforts of communicating throughout the organization are steeped in a process of social learning involving the roles that each person (leadership, managerial or individual contributors) has assumed either formally or informally throughout the organization.

As organizational members interact and exchange information, roles and role expectations develop. As roles develop, leadership takes on the task of “architecting” these interactions. The leadership goal here is to assure that these interactions foster effective exchanges of information between the role players, so that there is a shared understanding of the strategies and goals, while creating some congruence between the organization and the follower’s self-interests.

For many of us who have experienced “managing“or being managed, we understand that the process entails a wide variety of behaviors, both formal and informal. We accept that there may be a difference in expectations of the people interacting with managers/leaders. These differences of expectations create the opportunity for conflict. These differences center around personal beliefs of what the organization needs to accomplish, how it should be accomplished and who should be accomplishing it. These differences are driven by experiences, based on someone’s primary functional position within the firm or their actual or perceived “positional” power within the company.

All these different roles and/or beliefs lead to disconnections over which roles to play and the possibility of inconsistent messaging. Here, leadership and all levels of management need alignment or uncertainly prevails, leading to tension and role conflicts. If managers themselves are in conflict with their roles, organizational dysfunction forms. People avoid challenges (the opportunities for innovation, risk-taking and proactiveness); creating stress on the organization, people decide to leave (usually the best and the brightest) and the organization is stymied.

Therefore, the concept of consensus on the dominate logic (shared understanding on the need for change) is critical to effective leadership. This leads to a shared understanding, role clarity and hopefully greater trust throughout the organization.

Last, leadership needs some mechanisms to develop this consensus and trust to support their strategic directions. This leads us to three possible measures; market controls (objective criteria for evaluating new ideas/opportunities), bureaucratic controls (standardized behaviors and performance assessment) and clan controls that rely on the corporate culture to create a feeling of belonging while reinforcing the values of the organization.

References: Morris, M., Kuratko, D. and Covin, J., Corporate Entrepreneurship & Innovation; 2e, 2008

Author:

Joseph Erba

Professor of Practice
The University of North Carolina at Greensboro (UNCG)